• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

A quote that comes back within a day is a red flag rather than good service. Any serious team responds with questions first: about integrations. A supplier that commits to a figure before understanding the scope is probably guessing, and that guess will be corrected later — on your budget.

Be wary of a mismatch between the people you meet and those who eventually appear in the repository. Ask for the names and enterprise php CVs of the actual team in the statement of work, with a clause that requires notice before anyone is swapped. A provider that will only describe abstract roles ios and android app development company never names individuals is reserving the right to assign anyone it consulting services likes.

Ask for access to the repository from day one. A team that hands over code only at milestones is asking you to accept a black box. Visible commits reveal how many people are really working far better than any status report. This extends to the automated test suite: if nothing runs automatically, quality claims are nothing more than words.

Loose wording in the contract around IP is rarely an accident. The agreement needs to state plainly that all outputs produced under it belong to your business as they are paid for. Check also the jurisdiction and the milestone terms: a request for most of the money up front with no milestone tied to it removes your only leverage.

Lastly, look at the working rhythm. Confirm how many hours you will share each day, which named person answers questions and on what response times. Four hours of overlap is usually enough; zero overlap stretches every clarification into a lost day. Careless writing in the proposal will not improve under delivery pressure.